Virginia:
IN
THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF ALEXANDRIA
ILONA
GRENADIER HECKMAN
PLAINTIFF
VS
CASE NO. CL14-002193
JANICE
WOLK GRENADIER
DEFENDANT__
____________________________
RESPONSE TO
PLAINTIFF’S:
Petition to Quash LIS
PENDENS, An Award of Attorney’s Fees and Other Relief
DEFENDANT’S
COUNTER CLAIM / CROSS COMPLAINT: FOR
DISCRIMINATION – Religious; Social; Economic; Hierarchy.
ABUSE OF POWER, Ex-Parte Communications,
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, LYING in COURT, LYING in Court Documents, LYING in
Court Documents to the SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, BRIBERY, JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL
MISCONDUCT, HARRASSMENT, GANG ACTIVITY, RACKETEERING, RETALIATION, FORGERY,
EXTRINSIC FRAUD, EGREGIOUS LEGAL ERRORS, VIOLATION of the Code of Professional
Ethics; Title 18 US Code 241 & 242; Title 42 U.S Code 1981 & 1983;
Motion
Circuit Court Judges to recuse themselves from hearing any Motions and filing
the appropriate paper work due to past Violations: For DISCRIMINATION –
Religious; Social; Economic; Hierarchy. ABUSE OF POWER, Ex-Parte Communications, OBSTRUCTION
OF JUSTICE, allowing Lawyers to Lie in
COURT, Lie in Court Documents, BRIBERY,
JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT, HARRASSMENT, GANG ACTIVITY,
RACKETEERING, RETALIATION, FORGERY, EXTRINSIC FRAUD, EGREGIOUS LEGAL ERRORS,
VIOLATION of the Code of Professional Ethics; Title 18 US Code 241 & 242;
Title 42 U.S Code 1981 & 1983; Virginia Code 17 .1-105(b); The Cannons of Judicial Conduct and Rules of
Professional Conduct, Mail Fraud, Tampering With evidence , Theft of Evidence
COMES NOW Defendant Demands the Circuit Court Judges of
the City of Alexandria recuse themselves filing the appropriate paperwork with
the Supreme Court of Virginia - Virginia Code 17
.1-105(b) . That Ex – Parte
communications and misconduct by Ben DiMuro et al and the Alexandria Circuit
Court Judges in moving the date from July 9, 2014 to July 23, 2014 is due to
the press that would be present on July 9, 2014 for the much publicized Rape by
a Sheriff in the COA jail. That the date
of July 9, 2014 for the initial hearing was published in the paper. That
it is obvious the Judges have in the past and by all appearance are trying to
keep this Judicial Misconduct from being known. That the past Motions have
always gone last and with the Judge’s placing a Sheriff outside the door to
prevent others from coming into the court room to watch the proceedings.
That Notification that Ben
DiMuro is refusing to work with Defendant to find a mutually agreeable time to
have Motion heard as Defendant needs at least 6 hours for the 9 witness’s to be
heard and longer for a Jury to decide
DEMAND
FOR A TRIAL BY JURY
COMES NOW DEFENDANT DEMANDS Plaintiff a lawyer return Plaintiffs
properties and a Forensic Accountant review
all accounts. Plaintiff a lawyer has
been in possession of the following Property and Properties of Defendant which
resulted in Defendant’s Lis Pendens, which by law is the appropriate remedy to
protect Defendant’s interests.
That
Plaintiff owes Defendant for the following:
1. Sonia
Grenadier Trust
1. Note $ 30,000.00 /10% Interest $
307,576.25
Prevented Plaintiff from losing her Law
License and going to
Jail as Jim Arthur did.
2. Clients
which Defendant loss due to the Note(10% int) $2,471,940.78
Plaintiff
demanded acting as Defendants lawyer that she
had
to give up her client – the very min cost to that was
the
listings for the new homes
2. Real
Estate
1. Bellefonte
Ave – Personal ownership 50% (10% int) $ 504,003.25
2. GIC
Properties at least 24.5% $3,000.000.00
(accounting
of sales, rents, depreciation etc needed)
3. Southway
/ SouthHampton Terrace at least 24.5 %
$4,000,000.00
(
an accounting for rents, depreciation,
income etc needed)
The
apartments has Rental income of approx. $95.000 monthly
4. Monroe
Ave at least 24.5%
$ 500,000.00
(accounting
for rents income needed , etc)
3. Bankruptcy
– That Defendant would not have been in so is owed legal fees and expenses
1. Legal Fees – $ 319,613.81
2. Expenses
/ Damages
$ TBD
4. Damages
for actions that were and still are willful acts that are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton and grossly reckless in collusion with others.
Damages go back to the first known Lie /
Fraud to Defendant February 14, 1986
5. By
all appearance Ilona Grenadier is bringing in around $150,000, a month in rent
from properties. Majority of this rental
income is from properties acquired by stealing money from the Sonia Grenadier
Trust and Janice Wolk Grenadier. That Defendant by right owns at least 24.5% of
all properties BY RIGHT and VIRGINIA LAW.
History of Plaintiff
1. November
30, 1983 Ilona Grenadier was involved in
the FORGING of Sonia Grenadier‘s name to name Ilona an additional Trustee to
the Sonia Grenadier Trust – so she could steal from it.
2. March 1985 – Judge Albert Grenadier dies
3. Ilona
Grenadier pays an employee of her office David Grenadier to oversee the Trust
and to help her steal from it to purchase Real Estate in a partnership called
Grenadier Investment (GIC)
4. Ilona
continues to use the Forged Trust
Addendum to further steal from Sonia Grenadier with new evidence within this
year (2014) and the sale of a property called Bristow Road.
5. Ilona
works a deal with Jim Arthur to continue to control the Trust through her law
firm in 1985 – with the knowledge that Sonia Grenadier’s name was Forged
6. In
1989 Sonia Grenadier starts asking for an accounting of her assists
7. Through
letters and accountings Ilona Grenadier stole over $95,000 from the Sonia
Grenadier Trust during the time frame of March 1985 – March of 1990 when her
authority was revoked and all accounts turned over to Jim Arthur at Mays and
Valentine who joined them in January of 1990.
8. Ilona
Grenadier Heckman knowing it was much more than $40,000.00 tried to tell Jim
Arthur and others who were investigating that was all that she stole. She knew this was a lie. That Defendant from what little Defendant had learned in July / August of 1990 knew it
was closer to $65,000. and had informed Ilona of this.
9. In September
of 1985 by all appearance and according to King David Memorial Gardens using
the forged agreement Ilona stole Herman Grenadier from his resting place and moved him. Then Ilona Grenadier donated the 3 remaining spots that the Sonia
Grenadier Trust owned and according to Ilona took a personal tax deduction
10.
Ilona
Grenadier purchased from the Sonia Grenadier Trust a property at 314-A East
Curtis Ave, Alexandria Va. Instead of
putting money down by all appearance Ilona put a Note on the property with Sonia Grenadier. Ilona made the payments
not to Sonia as required by the note but, to Albert Grenadier then to David
Grenadier.
11.
Ilona
Grenadier / her law firm hid from the Attorneys and family of the Sonia
Grenadier Trust different accounts that
were part of the Sonia Grenadier Trust.
12. On
February 14, 1986 Ilona lied to
Defendant when she said with a big smile that Jerry Heckman had included her in
his will. Which he might have done
that. The smile was for the property by
all appearance called Bristow Road that she had stolen with the help of the
Fagelson Law firm from the Sonia Grenadier Trust. That a recent sale of the property and
Defendant herself researching the property shows the property was never legally
taken out of the Sonia Grenadier Trust.
That Herman Grenadier left everything to his wife. That the title shows in May of 1967 it being
in Sonia and Herman Grenadier’s name. No
documentation filed in Prince William County showing Sonia and Herman leaving
the property to Albert Grenadier. That
at the death of Albert Grenadier by all appearance this property should have
gone into the Sonia Grenadier Trust.
That in or around February 14, 1986 Ilona Grenadier took from the sale
of some of the property a portion of the sale of - $521,063.50.
That money was what Ilona Grenadier was excited about on February 14,
1986. Her ability to get away with
stealing Sonia Grenadiers portion.
13. That
the Bellefonte Property contract was written in or around October of 1986. That Ilona had David informed Defendant that they did not have the funds to
purchase it. This was a lie. In February
of 1986 Ilona had received the funds from
the Bristow Rd and was just starting to steal from the other accounts of
Sonia Grenadier through her law firm. This was done to swindle out of Janice her 50
% and David’s 25 %. Defendant lent David
the 25%. That when David left the
Marriage in August of 1997 by moving to the basement of the home by the advice
of Ilona Grenadier acting as his lawyer.
14. That
in March of 1990 Ilona and David were caught stealing the funds from the Sonia
Grenadier Trust. Ilona lied to everyone
about her role in it. Manipulating every
conversation and lying to everyone about her role in it and what would happen
to them if they got their own lawyer or discussed the actions of the Plaintiff
Ilona and the Ilona Grenadier’s law firm.
15. Once
caught Ilona took one half of David’s salary from him that he was being paid by
the law firm.
16. On
July 7, 1990 Ilona manipulated $30,000.00 from Defendant. Assuring her to keep it legal she would write
up a note and that 10% interest would accrue on the Note. That David would sign the note and Ilona /
her law firm working as Defendant’s lawyer
would hold the Note for safe keeping.
This was the morning after Janice had the night before gone through an
emergency C – section giving birth to “A”.
“A” was born with heart issues at or around 9 am on July 7th
the morning after “A”’s birth – Ilona is on the phone about Ilona’s great Idea
of Janice lending the money to pay back what Ilona / Ilona’s law firm had
stolen. Janice agreed due to the fact it was presented
to Janice “IF you don’t do this your husband the father
of your new baby will go to jail and be repeatedly raped”. At this point of the morning the Doctors from
Georgetown heart specialist had not been able to inform Janice how “A” was and
how long she would be in intensive care.
Ilona never asked how “A” was or what the doctors had said.
17. Ilona
wanted this money to keep the focus off the truth – That in May of 2008 Ilona turned to Janice and said David did not
steal that money. Which all the
documentation then shows it was Ilona who stole that money. Which Ilona was paying David a salary to work
with her on stealing the money.
18. Ilona
would stress often not to discuss with anyone or she could lose her law license
and David would go to jail. That not
only would David go to jail he would repeatedly be raped in jail, was Ilona’s
favorite way of putting it.
19. GIC
50% partner to Bellefonte Ave Partnership never paid it’s share of
expenses. All expenses were paid by the
Janice.
20. That
Ilona working as Defendant’s lawyer insisted and demanded she not continue a
working relationship with the purchaser of the property called Holland
Road. Which is where the commission that
was lent to David and Ilona came from.
Defendant lost a substantial amount of commissions as well as future
business with that decision.
21. Defendant with all the secrets and pressure
put on her by David and Ilona to keep their secrets and at the same time help
support the property’s was very warring on Defendant.
22. The law
is very clear in Virginia, when properties are owned even in a partnership if
they are not kept separate they become marital property. Which as a Divorce attorney Ilona Grenadier
is very aware of this.
23. In
November of 1997 Ilona decides it is time for the marriage of Defendant and
David to end. There are 2 children which
she has no interest in as they are being raised Catholic and Ilona is
Jewish. There is not enough money for
her to steal. She has fired David from her
law firm, since there is nothing or anyone for him to steal from for her.
24. In
November of 1997 Ilona engages an attorney that is not licensed to do business
in Virginia and splits the partnership up with not having Defendant sign any
documents. This is new evidence just
recently learned
25. Ilona
acting as an attorney is involved in a rumor that causes David to pull a gun in
the home of Defendant while the two young girls are upstairs. It is the hope that Defendant calls the
police and is arrested.
26. Ilona
- Defendant believes is also involved in the cab ride that Defendant took to
the airport in September of 1997 where Defendant is offered for $5,000. To have David killed.
27. Ilona
acting as attorney to get what is best for Ilona and to cover up the fact that
she has used an attorney not licensed in Virginia and aware of the laws and the
partnership – the co-mingling of Defendants funds and signature of defendant on
loans with Southway Terrace / Monroe Ave / other GIC properties which gives
Defendant ownership by right in all properties.
That Ilona Grenader Heckman a lawyer writes up and advices David it is
best and he is not to move out of the home until Defendant agrees to what Ilona
wants. This is to protect Ilona and only Ilona a lawyer.
28. That
Defendant was forced into Bankruptcy due to the actions of Plaintiff and David.
29. That
Ilona threatened Defendant on several occasions to keep quiet about the “Truth”
or she could lose her children.
30. That
Defendant was afraid of the Power, and the Corruption in the System, what would
happen to her children if she pursued the money and properties she had a right
to. Defendant never gave up her rights to what is by law hers.
31. That
Ilona a lawyer representing herself lied
in Federal Bankruptcy Court. That
Michael Weiser in documents filed in Bankruptcy Court stated there was no
property settlement so Bellefonte was or should be considered marital
property. Which if Bellefonte is marital
property with the Fraud of the marriage with the manipulation of Ilona on the money
that Plaintiff has put into GIC properties, Southway Terrace, Monroe Ave – The partnership in all of these
properties was marital. Defendant owns
at a minimum 24.5% in all properties.
32. That
GIC was owned 51% by Ilona Grenadier and 49% by David Grenadier gives Defendant
Janice Wolk Grenadier 24.5 % of all properties owned in GIC from August of 1997 when with Ilona’s advice David
moved to the basement of the home, not including Defendant in meals or any
laundry that he would do. That according
to Ilona as a Specialist in Divorce law advised David that would get him the
quickest divorce.
33. That
Defendant kept a low profile, was given sole custody of her girls.
34. That
David Grenadier when he left the home had a girlfriend Mary Drake for at least
if not more than 6 months prior to moving out.
David was regularly staying out all night with her.
35. In
September of 2007 Defendant filed to go
after the money stolen from Defendant - by Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
36. On
September 12, 2007 a lawyer Ilona Grenadier Heckman lied in court.
37. The
Slippery Slope of the Truth and of the collision of Equal Justice, Due Process,
Blind Justice and the desperate need of the Old Boy’s Network of Virginia / Judicial System of Virginia to protect one of their own -
hiding the criminal actions of Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
38. That
this case has opened up all the lies and manipulation that Defendant was
unaware of. This Lis Pendens is
about Defendant and Defendant’s daughters getting the approximately $ 8 – 10 Million dollars
owed (without damages or true accounting for 18 years of at least 24.5%
ownership of GIC /Monroe /Southway properties) that have been managed by Ilona
Grenadier Heckman that Ilona believe she can get away stealing from Janice and
her Daughters because they are Catholic.
39. That
this case shows who Ilona Ely Freedman
Grenadier Heckman is. That the manipulation of Defendant started on February
14, 1986 with the lie about the money she had stolen from Sonia Grenadier and
her Trust that day. How she would
continue to do so for another 5 years - thru March of 1990.
40. September
12, 2007 Defendant meets a Federal Judge who informs Defendant the law. That Defendant had just “WON” her case if she
had the documentation to prove it. The
Judge explained to Defendant what to do.
Defendant did the Motion for Default. That Judge’s do not like or
approve of lawyers lying in court.
41.
February 8, 2008 ~
Janice receives a Letter From Ilona Grenadier acting as a lawyer (on
her law firm stationary) to Janice Wolk Grenadier, Ilona Grenadier asserts ownership of 75% of a
property Known as 28 East Bellefonte Ave, Alexandria, VA 22305. Plaintiff also felt threatened by the letter
which is full of misleading and deceitful statements.
42. Two of
the Motions for Default are due to Ilona
Grenadier Heckman lying in documents:
1. Lying
in Admissions
2. Lying
In Court Documents stamped into the record
3. Lying
In Discovery
4. Lying
In Letters written on her law firm stationary as a lawyer representing herself
5. Lying
In the Answer to The Amended Bill of Complaint field on February 27, 2008 Ilona
lies again about owning 75% of the property
6. Ilona
lied when she no proof of actual payment and expenses had been provided
7. Ilona
lied when she stated that JWG didn’t own 50% of the property at least 4 times
8. Ilona
has bragged several times of her very personal and questionable relationship
with Judge J. Howe Brown. The question
was she giving him more than the free legal advice to have him ignore her lying
in documents?
9. Question
how close are Judge J. Howe Brown and Ilona Grenadier Heckman, that as
Ilona stated “He calls her all the time”
43. May of 2008:
1. Ilona Grenadier Heckman states “I
have nothing to do with your girls – the blood Grandchildren of Judge Grenadier
because you raised them Catholic? - the
truth JEWISH - ILONA GRENADIER HEKCMAN HATES CATHOLICS /CHRISTIANS –
2. Ilona Grenadier Heckman explains that Defendant should be grateful
to Ilona for the listing on Holland Road so Ilona could manipulate / stole the
money – The money which kept her from losing her law license and not going to
jail as Jim Arthur did.
3. Ilona Grenadier explains that David didn’t stole the money from Sonia
Grenadier Trust - which only left Ilona Grenadier and her law
firm to steal over $95,000.00 cash, She
stole Herman Grenadier and his Garden at King David, the Bristow Road Property
and the portion of $521,063.50 – and how much of the money in the sale in 1983
of $81,000, and the Sale in October of
1984 - $ 200,000 did Ilona steal? Ilona paid the note back from the Custis
property first to Albert Grenadier then
David Grenadier instead of the rightful owner Sonia Grenadier. Ilona stole
Herman from his resting place, donating his garden and taking a personal tax
deduction from the donation.
4. Defendant
introduces herself to Judge Haddock after he speaks with Ilona – Chief Judge Haddock explains to Defendant “You will
never get a fair trial as we all
Love Ilona” Defendant turns to Diane
Fiske shocked by the statement and express’s I can’t believe he just said that
to me. What is and was Chief Judge
Donald Haddocks relationship with Ilona that he would put his reputation his
career, his family on the line for her?
5. Again
Defendant ask’s Diane Fiske about getting Judge’s that Ilona did have a special
extra ordinary friendship with..
44. June 18, 2008 – Plaintiff
Files:
- Motion for Default - Ilona has lied in the Admissions
A. For
Ilona lying in court to Judge Kloch on September 12, 2007 ~ Motion for Default
B. For
Motion for Default filed in February for Ilona
Lying in the Answer to Bill of Complaint
by defendant and Counter claim and Cross Complaint
C. For
lies in Admissions
D. For
the letters Ilona sent Bulling & Threatening Janice if Janice didn’t drop the suit.
- Motion for Trial by Jury – Due to comments made by Judge Haddock & Ilona Grenadier
A.
Judge Haddock telling Plaintiff she
could never get a fair trial as they all “LOVE” Ilona
B.
Ilona informing Plaintiff all the Judges
were friends of hers & she gave them free legal advice when they called her
45. July 9, 2008 –
Judge Howe Brown – rules :
- Denies motion for Default
- Denies motion for Trial by Jury
- And makes both sides work on response’s in the Motion to Compel
Ilona
reminds Janice how much Judge Howe Brown likes her and calls her.
September 2011 Ilona Grenadier & Ben DiMuro generous donation to the Judge Donald
M. Haddock Portrait fund -
September 15, 2011 Ilona
Grenadier through her law firm throws a party on the Miss Mallory in
Alexandria, Virginia, by all appearance a $100,000 + party.
Ilona Grenadier tries to
assert she does not owe Defendant and Defendant is extorting money from
her. Detective Pak of the COA Police as
a favor tried to intimidate and scare Defendant for Ilona Grenadier Heckman.
Ilona
Grenadier makes a generous donation to Ed Semonian Clerk of Court for his
campaign as a Thank you –
Ilona in November / December 2012 has a gentleman by the name of Mark Stuart
contact Defendant - He is to harm Defendant
- Drug her and get inappropriate sexual
pictures of her, Rape on of her daughters or plant drugs on one of the girls or
in Defendants home. Whatever takes to
stop the TRUTH from coming out.
Ilona
in this same time period has the workers in the City of Alexandria harass
Defendant and sue her over a gutter that has come off.
That
just like the day “A” was born with Issues and Ilona asks to borrow the
$30,000. to pay back money she stole.
The day after my Dad died she had her GANG attacking Defendant through
e-mails.
Ilona
always tells everyone how she is going to sue Defendant- She and David even stole a car that Defendant
had purchased for “M” and sold it –
FORGING something with the DMV is the only way they could have done it. Defendant has the original title. When asked about it – Ilona and David laugh and say who cares – you really think
anyone in the Judicial Community will touch us.
Do you really believe anyone will ever hold us accountable? Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman believes
and lives her life as if she is above the law.
Ilona
Grenadier creates a Gang / Klue Klux Klan type group consisting of Robin /
Rachel Grenadier – Loretta Lax Miller aka Muggy Cats aka Billy Sullivan aka
Leah Lax presidential Candate for 2016, her attorneys DiMuroGinsber and others to Harass, Lie on line, Slander,
Start a Blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com
because she does not want the Truth about what she owes Defendant coming out.
Ilona also in May of 2008 stated to Defendant “Me and my family had
nothing to do with your girls as you raised them Catholic”
On December 24
of 2013 Ilona went
full force in trying to stop the Truth from being investigated. Her GANG / Klue Klux Klan sent this e-mail to
Defendant - Defendant has over 100 similar harassing e-mails.
Tue,
Dec 24, 2013 at 2:05 PM
|
|
something more scarier I
contacted Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman your witch hunt is
over
|
|||||||||||||||
Janice
/ Defendant has probably close to 100 e-mails that are similar in threats –
That Ilona or her Gang have sent to Janice / Defendant.
The threat of having thousands come to JWG home
intimidate and threaten JWG and allowed by courts and Alex Police – I am not
sure what Ilona has paid them -
We hope that you join us on Friday, January 10th, 2014
outside of Janice Wolk Grenadier's house to protest her anti-American pro-Satan
values. Email us at muggycatscreams@aol.com for Janice Wolk Grenadier's
address. We are expecting at least 200 people so don't forget to
bring Holy Water from your church to purify and sactify the land
of the supporter of the Anti Christ and the mother of the vessel of Satan.
We will have a prayer session to pray for her lack of soul but do not look
her straight in the eyes or you will be turned to stone.
Ilona,
her lawyers and friends advertised this all over the internet – Twitter, Blogs,
Facebook, Google+. Ilona has ruined
Defendant, manipulated, stolen from, Defendant
and her two girls.
Prior
to generous gifts from Ilona and Ilona needing Robin / Rachel Grenadier this is
what Rachel / Robin thought of Ilona:
-----Original Message-----
From: rlgrennie@yahoo.com
To: jwolkgrenadier@aol.com
Cc: klg3g@comcast.net;
algrenadier@earthlink.net
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2009 12:58 am
Subject:
Per usual, Janice.
Ilona
cannot be telling the truth but that is in keeing with her long tradition of
obfuscation and bullshit.
There is a reason my entire
family hates her, and that includes my father's closest relative, which is not
as Ilona claims, Jerry.
Ilona had absolutely nothing to do with David signing over any
inheritance rights. That was my
grandmother's position. She never heard from
David or Brian, so even if David had not stolen a cent from her he would have
been disinherited.
Ilona was never a
signatory to any of the documentation between Helen and David. It did not concern her at all. She
may have forced David's hand because she had much to lose and answer for,
but she did not actually steal the money, David did. Ilona acted as the agent and was in charge of
GIC where the money was alleged by you to have been deposited by David. She did maintain control over GIC funds. It is
a shame none of Ilona's attorneys ever studied joint and several liability
in law school. She (Plaintiff) had liability in that respect. You are incorrect on that matter, as
well. She resigned as trustee because my grandmother determined that she
could not be trusted after my father died and she saw how she was being treated
by her. And
yes, I knew about the note between Ilona and David.
(this is the NOTE
that Ilona/Plaintiff had David sign – that Plaintiff brought up the morning
after “A” was born)
I have no idea why
you included Jerry in your emails. He is
not involved in any of this matter but since ethics is not your forte I doubt
you noticed.
As for the girls,
you made it impossible for us to ever see them.
Even when I lived a few blocks away, the only time I ever saw them was
when I caught them between school, after-school activities or went to A's
soccer games or when David had them for awhile.
Andrew does not ever see his cousins which is also shame. You
raised them to be snobs with bone-headed values which is also a shame. The girls do not ever meet or associate with
Jews which is also your doing. I
doubt A ever would meet one at Ole Miss.
I know you sent A to a summer daycamp and then complained that
minorities went there. Instilling racism
into your children is actually a form of child abuse. I got that from A herself and witnessed the
daycamp saga first-hand. Andrea and
Brian rarely get to see the girls and that is also your doing. All I can do is pray that someday they get to
know the better side of their family tree.
Your own family is hardly what one would deem suitable role models.
(I
raised my girls Catholic and we celebrated all Jewish holidays with very close
friends who were Jewish – to my knowledge not once have I seen my x-husband in
a synagogue unless for a funeral – nor at anytime has any of his siblings
invited the girls to a synagogue. I was
given sole custody of the girls for a reason – but that is not what this is
about)
1. Email
dated and sent from:
-----Original Message-----
From: Rachel rlgrennie@yahoo.com
To: jwolkgrenadier@aol.com
Cc:
algrenadier@earthlink.net; klg3g@comcast.net
Sent:
Tue, Jul 7, 2009 11:32 am
Subject:
Whatever, Janice. For the past
Yes,
go ahead and show A what I wrote. That would be in keeping with your psychotic
attempts to alienate all of us from the girls.
I stand by what I said. Your daughters went to private Catholic
schools. They are historically not known
for their tolerance of others. The facts
bear me out on that statement. My
Catholic friends call the Pope a "wanker" and with good reason. He was in the Hitler Youth. M recently wrote how happy she was that a
country singer showed up at her high school calling it the "most important
event" in her life which is sad.
Important things in life should be marriages, graduations from colleges
and later, having families of their own.
The values you instilled in both the girls are not values their
grandparents or great-grandparents would appreciate. I did not call A or M racists,
I called you one. You sure as hell
raised them to have no contacts with people from any other place in the world
except white Anglo-saxons which is sad.
–
In
an e-mail by Andrea Grenadier: On or around February 9, 2009 –
Thanks, Janice!
Interesting point about
only inheriting a few thousand from dad. Ilona
had
re-written dad's will, as you know, after she had promised
him that she would
"take care of"
his children. Of course, we all found out what "take care of"
meant to her! The several
thousand dollars we inherited wasn't actually that
much -- it was from an
insurance policy that dad had, and it was about $1,200.
She was incredibly pissed
when she found out that she had missed that, because she wanted everything.
Dad's former secretary, Agnes Wilkes, knew that there was an
earlier will, and so did Jack Duvall. Ilona said they were both lying.
My grandfather's mistake
was in trusting too much, and not putting his property in a bypass trust. But
when he died, my parents were splitting up, and there was no reason to believe
that dad would marry someone like Ilona. My grandfather would have been highly
distressed to know that someone stole his grandchildren's inheritance, but this
doesn't seem to bother Ilona, who has constantly lied to me, and told me there
wasn't anything.
Love,
A
E-mail’s
dated May 16, 2013 From: Ilona Grenadier Heckman and David Grenadier in
regard to the theft of my car that was sold by them without a Title or with a
forged Title:
“Do me a favor of not sending any more
e-mails. You are clearly mentally disturbed.
You are irrelevant to me and the girls are nothing more than an
unpleasant distraction.” You don’t have any claim to the car. If you want to pursue the 500 dollars, which
by the way went to ole miss, I believe the general district court has
jurisdiction. Good luck with
that.”
(Mocking
Defendant knowing he and Ilona have control over all the Judges that they can
forge a car title and get away with it this is May 16, 2013)
E-mail dated July 16, 2016 -
On July 15, 2013 Defendant’s father
died which the Plaintiff and her gang Andrea Grenadier and Rachel/Robin
Grenadier were aware of this and decided to BULLY and try to further IDIMITATE
Defendant these e-mails are sent to harass, bully, and their actions still are willful acts that are malicious, violent,
oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, or grossly reckless to intimidate. Their religious overtones once again about
Defendant being Catholic only shows this is a pattern of a Religious Civil
Rights Hate Crime against Defendant by Ilona Grenadier, Ben DiMuro,
Rachel/Robin Grenadier and Andrea Grenadier:
“You are to quit harassing her,
David and the courts, or I will come and deal with you personally and when I
do, I shall bring all the relevant
documents which prove YOUR forgeries of my grandmother's signatures to sales
contracts and the like which you foolishly and rashly sent to me some time
ago. WIth my legal background, it would take me all of five minutes to
write and notarize an affidavit to that effect. You also must have clearly
forgotten that I am a former officer of the Federal courts and hear things
about you from sources other than our immediate family constantly.
Furthermore, insulting Federal judges as you have done will get you into
more trouble than I think you realize as that is a Federal offense with stiff
jail time included PLUS fines which I really doubt you can afford. Frankly, I
am mystified none of the judges in the district court in Alexandria has had you
interrogated and/or arrested by the FBI. As in the past, I will be happy to
assist them should it become necessary.
“Janice, I am letting you know now that I do not have patience for your behavior and will take whatever means necessary to undo the damage you have caused my family's reputation. I am sorry that David ever married you and I am sure he is, as well. You keep dredging up the fact that you were "giving birth" to our nieces when the trouble began with Jim Arthur (which above Robin mentions the Note that Ilona has which is when Ilona introduced the idea of being able to settle this situation of the missing funds from the Sonia Greandier Trust – so by all appearance and the words of Rachel/Robin she has been involved in collusion with Ilona from the start), but I wonder why you have never considered their reputations as your children? David is not the source of your problems today, you are entirely to blame for your own behavior as adults usually are, unless they are mentally unhinged and adjudicated as such by courts of competent jurisdiction. I hope you will stop taking advantage of your children in this manner. It is a form of child abuse and you have been doing it since they were minor children. If M ever wanted to become a lawyer and follow in her grandfather's footsteps you are making it impossible for her to do so in the city in which she was born. Maybe it is time you consider their futures instead of constantly harping on the past which you created out of your own greed and corrupt intentions.”
“Janice, I am letting you know now that I do not have patience for your behavior and will take whatever means necessary to undo the damage you have caused my family's reputation. I am sorry that David ever married you and I am sure he is, as well. You keep dredging up the fact that you were "giving birth" to our nieces when the trouble began with Jim Arthur (which above Robin mentions the Note that Ilona has which is when Ilona introduced the idea of being able to settle this situation of the missing funds from the Sonia Greandier Trust – so by all appearance and the words of Rachel/Robin she has been involved in collusion with Ilona from the start), but I wonder why you have never considered their reputations as your children? David is not the source of your problems today, you are entirely to blame for your own behavior as adults usually are, unless they are mentally unhinged and adjudicated as such by courts of competent jurisdiction. I hope you will stop taking advantage of your children in this manner. It is a form of child abuse and you have been doing it since they were minor children. If M ever wanted to become a lawyer and follow in her grandfather's footsteps you are making it impossible for her to do so in the city in which she was born. Maybe it is time you consider their futures instead of constantly harping on the past which you created out of your own greed and corrupt intentions.”
2. E-mail From: Rachel/Robin Grenadier:
To: Janice I am not -
-
fucking
around with you. Remove my correspondence to you from me immediately from
your pathetic blog or I will sue you. I have also forwarded your comments to
the appropriate Federal authorities who have jurisdiction over you. Period. End
of discussion.
3. E- Mail From: Andrea
Grenadier
Andrea Grenadier <algrenadier@earthlink.net>
|
Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 7:02 PM
|
To: JW Grenadier <jwgrenadier@gmail.com>
Cc: Karen Grenadier <klg3g@comcast.net>, Rachel
Grenadier <rlgrennie29@hotmail.com>, David Grenadier
<renovo1@msn.com>
|
|
Janice, you are really a repulsive
little bitch. My sister worked her ass of for the Justice Department for over
25 years. She has EARNED her early retirement. What in the hell have you done
these past 25 years, except for aggravate everyone? You b
need to get a life, seriously. And shouldn't you be down in Florida right
now? (this is where it shows they knew my Father had died on July
15, 2013)
Do not bother to write back. You are just scum.
Sent from Saturn.
Sent from Saturn.
Ilona
Ely Freedman Grenadier
Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman is a Lawyer that has made a
Mockery of this court, the Judge’s and the Virginia Judicial System. That the Facts and the Truth have not
changed. That Ilona a Lawyer is guilty
of the following criminal actions: of
being involved in , Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting
obstruction of Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of
money from the Sonia Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great
personal gain over $10 Million in Real Estate,
Theft of Herman Grenadier, joint and several liability (per
Rachel/Robin e-mail) malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of Office,
Conspiracy, Collusion, Gang like
activity mirror image to the Klue Klux Klan, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing
Due Process, conflict of interest – related to the practice of law, violating
code of ethics, has liability to her victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state
Constitutional, Virginia Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary
Duties, RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT,
Title 18 US Code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and 242 Deprivation of
rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions, Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was
enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC§ 912.
With her Intention to 18 USC § 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract, Arbitrary and Capricious
behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, § 18.2-498.3. Misrepresentations
prohibited, § 18.2-172 - Judicial Misconduct; Criminal
Misconduct; Mail Fraud; Honest Serves Fraud; Extortion; Harassment; Gang
activity; Racketeering; Retaliation; Discrimination; et al. not limited to: decisions made in bad faith
for a corrupt purpose, deliberately and intentionally failing to follow the
law; Extrinsic fraud; Egregious legal errors; Violation of Procedural Rules;
Violation of Due Process; uttering,
etc., other writings et al. All of above charges will and can be proven
with letters, documents, witnesses who have also been harmed by the actions of
Plaintiff.
Conclusion
Wherefore
the options
are Ilona / Plaintiff can be demanded to return properties and money owed to
Defendant. This can be held over for a
Trial by Jury. That a Special Grand Jury
should be immediately installed to investigate the criminal actions of Ilona
Grenadier Heckman an attorney and her gang.
The Facts are known, The Truth is known.
That the law is very clear as the Judicial Cannons and the Code for
Professional Behavior calls for if anyone of this profession is aware of
another Lawyer or Judge acting for personal benefit outside the law they are
required to report such behavior, not cover it up.
That the Judges in
the Circuit Court of Alexandria under the law are required to recuse themselves
and a Judge that has no personal or professional relationship should hear this
Motion.
Dated this July 8, 2014
______________________________________
Janice
Wolk Grenadier
Pro Se
15 West
Spring Street
Alexandria,
Virginia 22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
Certificate of Service
I hereby certify that a true
and accurate copy of the foregoing document was delivered on July 8, 2014 to Defendants attorney Ben
DiMuro at DiMuroGinsberg PC – 1101 King Street, Suite 610, Alexandria VA 22314.
July 8,
2014
Janice Wolk Grenadier
Pro Se
As John F
Kennedy said “The
cost of freedom is always high, but Americans have always paid it. And one path we shall never choose, and that
is the path of surrender, or submission” and “There are risks and costs to
action. But, they are far less than the
long range risks of comfortable inaction.
